Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • About
    • About TREC
    • Advancing Equity
    • Our Staff
    • Our Researchers
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Media Coverage
  • Programs
    • Transportation Data
    • The Initiative for Bicycle and Pedestrian Innovation
    • TREC Resource Hub
    • PacTrans
    • Better Block PSU
    • Workforce Development
    • National Institute For Transportation And Communities
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Transportation Seminars
    • BikePed Training
    • Summer High School Camp
    • Ann Niles Lecture
    • Past Events
  • Research and Data
    • Research Areas
    • Researchers
    • All Projects
    • Final Reports
    • PORTAL: Portland-Vancouver
    • BikePed Portal: National
    • For Researchers
  • Study at PSU
    • Why Study at PSU?
    • Degrees and Courses
    • STEP Student Group
    • Graduate Research Assistants
    • Scholars
    • Sustainable Transportation Study Abroad
User account menu
  • Log in

Transferability & Forecasting of the Pedestrian Index Environment (PIE) for Modeling Applications

Transferability & Forecasting of the Pedestrian Index Environment (PIE) for Modeling ApplicationsPhoto

Principal Investigator:

Kelly Clifton, Portland State University


Summary:

There have been important advances in non-motorized planning tools in recent years, including the development of the MoPeD pedestrian demand model (Clifton et al., 2013, 2015). This tool and others are increasingly requested by governments and agencies seeking to increase walking activity and create more walkable places. To date, the MoPeD tool has been piloted with success in the Portland region ... There have been important advances in non-motorized planning tools in recent years, including the development of the MoPeD pedestrian demand model (Clifton et al., 2013, 2015). This tool and others are increasingly requested by governments and agencies seeking to increase walking activity and create more walkable places. To date, the MoPeD tool has been piloted with success in the Portland region using data unique to Metro, the metropolitan planning organization. However, there is increasing interest from planning agencies in adapting the pedestrian modeling tools and their inputs for use in their own jurisdictions. Unfortunately, other regions often do not have uniform access to the same kinds of pedestrian environment data as Metro, particularly at such a fine-grained scale. In this next phase of our pedestrian modeling work (see Clifton et al., 2013, 2015), this project focuses on making our measures, models, and methods more transferable to other locations. Specifically, we will re-evaluate, compare and test our pedestrian index of the environment (PIE) measure using data resources more commonly available to planning agencies across the country. Next, we test the results of PIE and its input data in models of pedestrian mode choice for stability of estimation results within a region (intraregional) and between regions (interregional). This research is the next logical step in the MoPeD’s enhancement and is critical to enabling its utility beyond the Portland region. In terms of index inputs, the results of this project show that population density and pedestrian connectivity had the most consistent and strong relationship to walk mode choice across all of our regions, which echoed the long literature on this topic. However, the other components of the built environment included in PIE had more variability in their ability to explain walk mode choice. Employment density and its subset urban living infrastructure (ULI), intended to capture retail and service access, had less explanatory power and stability in the cities tested. Based upon these findings, we provide several guidelines for the construct of walkability indices, including variables and spatial scales. Our findings raise questions about the relationship between walking and the built environment within a region and thus, the intraregional transferability of one walkability index is suspect. Estimation results suggest that there may be different responses to the built environment in lower-density vs. higher density regimes and that these relationships may be nonlinear. However, smaller sample sizes of travel survey data in high density areas in all of the US cities tested pose limitations to drawing more confident conclusions from these results. The interregional comparisons of PIE and walk mode share between Los Angeles and Portland showed promise for the use of the index in different regions. In these two regions, model results showed a similar walk mode share for the same values of PIE constructed at the block group level. This provides initial support that the PIEbg construct may be transferrable between metropolitan regions, in part, due to population density's prominent role in PIE. See More

Project Details

Project Type: Research
Project Status: Completed
End Date: March 31, 2018
UTC Funding: $137,267

Downloadable Products

  • Assessing the transferability of the Pedestrian Index of the Environment (PIE) walkability measure for pedestrian modeling (PRESENTATION)
  • Transferring the pedestrian index of the environment: models and measures across and within regions (PRESENTATION)
  • Analyzing the relationship of walking and the built environment (PRESENTATION)
  • Walk don't run (PRESENTATION)
  • Density Differences: Exploring Built Environment Relationships with Walking Between and Within Metropolitan (PRESENTATION)
  • An exploration of the inter- and intra-regional relationships between the built environment and walking (PRESENTATION)
  • TRANSFERABILITY & FORECASTING OF THE PEDESTRIAN INDEX ENVIRONMENT (PIE) FOR MODELING APPLICATIONS (REPORT)
  • Transferability & Forecasting of the Pedestrian Index of the Environment (PIE) for Modeling Applications (FINAL_REPORT)
  • Executive Summary: New Pedestrian Modeling Tools (PROJECT_BRIEF)
  • Making Strides: State of the Practice of Pedestrian Forecasting in Regional Travel Models (PUBLICATION)

 

© 2024 | Transportation Research and Education Center | 503-725-8545 | asktrec@pdx.edu